CNN.com
October 6, 2011
Moni Basu
http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/06/world/norway-nobel-peace-prize/index.html?iref=allsearch
Summary-
The debate over who should win this year's Nobel Peace Prize has many possible answers, and among the contenders are many internet bloggers who have contributed to uprisings against unjust governments all over the world. Mexican bloggers have stood up to the drug cartel, and a Tunisian blogger managed to tell the world about the struggle there, long before Tunisia changed drastically. Among these bloggers is Julian Assange, who had revealed many American secrets and documents.
Connection-
America's security has been violated by Julian Assange, who hacked and then distributed secret information across the internet. It has been debated whether he was within his rights to do so, and whether or not the safety of America is at stake because of this. If he wins the Nobel Peace Prize, it could seem that he was just as justified in his actions as the bloggers opposing the Mexican drug cartel. This may affect American policy on what information is kept secret, and possibly what is done when no eyes seem present.
This connects to class through discussions on the first amendment, and whether protection from terrorism is enough of a reason to limit freedom of speech.
Personal Reaction-
Julian Assange's actions deserve to be applauded, and he should win the Nobel Peace Prize. If Mexican drug cartels secure power through fear and intimidation, then they are dishonest and should not be held to the high standards that a free country like the United States should have. His actions have revealed many problems that should not exist, and has helped America retain its honesty and integrity. The United States should remain "for the people", and not become something dishonest that hides its leaders violations of the laws and ethics that they should hold close to their hearts.
No comments:
Post a Comment